Notice: Funktionen _load_textdomain_just_in_time blev kaldt forkert. Indlæsning af oversættelse for twentyseventeen-domænet blev udløst for tidligt. Dette er normalt en indikator for, at noget kode i pluginet eller temaet kører for tidligt. Oversættelser bør indlæses ved init-handlingen eller senere. Se venligst Fejlfinding i WordPress for mere information. (denne meddelelse blev tilføjet i version 6.7.0). in /customers/0/b/c/livogledelse.dk/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/0/b/c/livogledelse.dk/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /customers/0/b/c/livogledelse.dk/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/onecom-vcache/vcaching.php on line 630 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/0/b/c/livogledelse.dk/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /customers/0/b/c/livogledelse.dk/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/onecom-vcache/vcaching.php on line 638 The new look strategy adopted the brand new ‘Peer Report about Electronic Lookup Strategies’ (PRESS) rule – Liv og Ledelse

The new look strategy adopted the brand new ‘Peer Report about Electronic Lookup Strategies’ (PRESS) rule

The new look strategy adopted the brand new ‘Peer Report about Electronic Lookup Strategies’ (PRESS) rule

A systematic remark and you will meta-investigation was basically carried out following methodology regarding ‘Popular Revealing Affairs to have Scientific Feedback and Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) [19, 20].

Document look and you can selection

A journey are accomplished ranging from , causing the selection of the next databases: Education Tips Recommendations Cardiovascular system (ERIC), via ProQuest; Psychological Recommendations (PsycINFO), thru APA PsycNET; Medical Books Investigation and you will Recovery Program (MEDLINE), through ProQuest; Scopus, through Elsevier; and you can ISI Net away from Technology (WoS Center Collection), through Thomson Reuters. The word ‘sexting’ found in prior opinion studies [step 1, 2, 4, 11, fifteen, 22–24] was applied while the a great descriptor to identify a critical number of training while it began with various scientific fields, like those out-of Psychology, Education, Sociology, Technical, Wellness Sciences and Judge Sciences. To help you render a very comprehensive opinion, a great ‘gray literature’ search was carried out utilising the Bing and you may Bing Pupil google into the after the terms: “sexting”, “sext”, “intimate texting” and you can “intimate chatting”. Per week notification was indeed developed for new browse for the PsycINFO, Websites out of Science, and you will Scopus, up to . The fresh new resource directories regarding relevant empirical articles and you will reviews have been https://lovingwomen.org/fr/blog/sites-de-datation-philippines/ plus appeared to identify other probably qualified knowledge. In addition, i called related experts thru elizabeth-mail and you can/or ResearchGate so you’re able to request full-messages or even to assemble more information on the studies (6 away from 17 solicitations was answered, and you will 3 came across all of our desires). In order to support replication of comment, S1 Table gets the certain look approach included in per databases consulted.

Addition and you may different standards

In accordance with the mentioned expectations in the search, studies was indeed integrated once they: a) aligned to examine the fresh new prevalence off sexting and/or the correlates; b) made-up a sample of people doing 18 years old; c) offered original empirical data; and you can d) was in fact obtainable in English otherwise Foreign-language. Regarding your addition expectations a great), three you can incidence percent had been considered in terms of for every single research, associated respectively to your particular measures from: sending; receiving; and you may forwarding.

Basic, articles fulfilling the new addition standards was in fact picked, and you will, whenever decisions could not be manufactured from the label and abstract alone, a full paper is retrieved also. This new chose documents had been searched separately by article writers CME and ELG. One discrepancies was in fact resolved using talk with a third author (JML) in which needed.

Additional degree analyzing data on exact same research study was indeed integrated on condition that brand new shot or perhaps the way of measuring sexting differed certainly one of him or her. S2 Desk summarizes this new excluded knowledge, when you find yourself Fig 1 depicts the fresh new flowchart of your systematic comment procedure. The studies within the meta-data is referenced inside the S1 Appendix.

Data coding

Getting programming aim, the following data, along with bibliometric information in addition to browse steps of your original knowledge, is actually registered: a) form of publication (studies or grasp thesis, article or declaration, peer-assessed, not peer-assessed or lower than feedback); b) seasons away from guide of study; c) year of data collection; d) geographical source of your samples classified according to eight-region design: Africa, China, European countries, The united states, South america, Antarctica and you will Oceania/Australia; e) data construction (cross-sectional otherwise longitudinal questionnaire); f) style of test (probabilistic or non-probabilistic); g) reference population (elizabeth.grams., preadolescents, middle school children, high school students); h) shot proportions and you will proportion of women; i) diversity, mean and you may simple departure of your ages of the participants; j) government processes (mobile otherwise face-to-deal with interviews, on the internet, paper-dependent otherwise combined survey); k) message posts (sms, images/clips, or one another); l) level of sexual explicitness of the posts (naked, perhaps not nude, both); m) framework where sexting are practiced (romantic relationship, other people or otherwise not defined); n) desire of the people for the sexting methods (sending: voluntary, perhaps not voluntary, perhaps not defined; receiving: solicited, unsolicited, perhaps not outlined; forwarding: having agree, instead concur, maybe not discussed); o) schedule of measure of sexting (? 6 months otherwise > six months, life, or not discussed); and p) sexting action prevalence results (sending, acquiring, forwarding).